NEEDS STATEMENT

There is a critical need for improved integration of evidence-based guideline recommendations into the routine management of pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), as prescribing data continue to demonstrate persistent variation in care and continued antibiotic use despite strong evidence and guideline recommendations. This gap persists even though much of the evidence informing best practices has been available for nearly a decade and reflects inconsistent application of current evidence, diagnostic uncertainty, time-limited clinical encounters, and difficulty managing parent expectations while maintaining patient satisfaction, despite clinician awareness of antimicrobial stewardship principles. This activity is designed to address these needs through concise, evidence-based education on current pediatric ARTI guidelines, emphasizing practical clinical decision-making and communication strategies. By combining guideline education with implementation-focused strategies and opportunities for reflection and improvement, the activity aims to support application of evidence in real-world practice and promote sustained improvements in pediatric ARTI management.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This course is intended for CommonSpirit physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and physician assistants working in ambulatory care settings and managing pediatric patients.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

At the conclusion of the activity, participants should be able to:

• Describe evidence-based approaches to watchful waiting in pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs).
• Explain effective communication principles for discussing pediatric diagnoses and treatment plans with parents and caregivers.
• Analyze reported penicillin allergy in children to determine when alternative antibiotics are indicated.
• Summarize individual-level and population-level risks associated with unnecessary antibiotic use in pediatric patients.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

Self-paced, asynchronous enduring material.

EVALUATION

Evaluation by questionnaire will address program content, presentation, and possible bias.

PEER REVIEW

In [month/year], this continuing medical education online enduring material was reviewed by [reviewer name and credentials]. To ensure the continued scientific relevance of this enduring material, its content will be reviewed again in [month/year].

[Reviewer name and credentials]

[Affiliation]

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose